<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
     "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
  <meta HTTP-EQUIV=CONTENT-TYPE CONTENT="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  <title>Composable UDT - Evaluation</title>
</head>
<body text="#5F5F5F" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" link="#000080" vlink="#0000CC" alink="#000080">
<center>
<a href="text0.html">First page</a> <a href="text37.html">Back</a> <a href="text39.html">Continue</a> <a href="text49.html">Last page</a> <a href="udt-2009.html">Overview</a> <a href="img38.html">Graphics</a></center><br>
<h1 style="direction:ltr;"><b><font color="#808000">Composable UDT - Evaluation</b></font></h1>
<ul><li style="direction:ltr;"><h2>Simplicity</h2></li>
<ul><li style="direction:ltr;">Can it be easily used?</li>
</ul><li style="direction:ltr;"><h2>Expressiveness</h2></li>
<ul><li style="direction:ltr;">Can it be used to implement most control protocols?</li>
</ul><li style="direction:ltr;"><h2>Similarity</h2></li>
<ul><li style="direction:ltr;">Can Composable UDT based implementations reproduce the performance of their native implementations?</li>
</ul><li style="direction:ltr;"><h2>Overhead</h2></li>
<ul><li style="direction:ltr;">Will the overhead added by Composable UDT be too large?</li>
</ul></ul><br>
<h3>Notes:</h3>
<p style="direction:ltr;"><font color="#000000">We care about four performance characteristics of Composable UDT. Can it be easily used? Can it be used to implement most control protocols? Can composable UDT based implementations reproduce the performance of their native implementations? And will the overhead added by composable UDT be too large?</font></p>
<p style="direction:ltr;"><font color="#000000"></font></p>
</body>
</html>